**ABSTRACT**

This study examines the analysis of fixed-effect
non-interactive unbalanced data by a method called Intra-Factor Design. And to
derive this design for analysis, mathematically, the matrix version of the
fixed-effect model, Y

_{ijk}= µ + τ_{i}+ β_{j}+ ε_{ijk}, was used. This resulted to the definition and formation of many matrices such as the Information Matrix,**; Replication Vector,**__L____r__; Incidence Matrix,**; Vector of adjusted factor A**__N__**totals,****; Variance–Covariance Matrix,**__q__**, which is the generalized inverse of the Information Matrix; and other Matrices. The Least Squares Method which gave birth to several normal equations was used to estimate for the parameters,**__Q__**τ**and**β**mathematically. Then, an illustrative example was given to ascertain the workability of this Intra-Factor procedure in testing for the main effects under some stated hypothesis for significance. But, before testing for the variance component of the main effects on the illustrative data, it was necessary to first ascertain that the data is fixed-effect and that interaction is either absent or non-significant since our interest is on “Fixed-Effect Non-interactive Models”. Thereafter, the Analysis of Variance Components for Adjusted Factor A with Unadjusted Factor B effects was carried out. This gave the result that Adjusted Factor A effect, τ, was not significant; whereas, the Unadjusted Factor B effect, β, was significant. Also, the Analysis of Variance Components was performed for Unadjusted Factor A effect with Adjusted Factor B effect and it yielded similar result as that of Adjusted Factor A with Unadjusted Factor B effects. We therefore concluded that for a Fixed Effect, Non-interactive Unbalanced Data Analysis, the Method of Intra-Factor Design can be successfully employed.

**CHAPTER ONE****
**

**INTRODUCTION**

**1.0 INTRODUCTION**

Estimating
variance component from unbalanced data is not as straightforward
as from balanced data. This is so for two reasons. Firstly, several
methods of estimation are available (most of which reduce to the analysis
of variance method for balanced data), but no one of them has yet been
clearly established as superior to others. Secondly, all the methods involve
relatively cumbersome algebra; discussion of unbalanced data can therefore
easily deteriorate into a welter of symbols, a situation we do our best to minimize here. However, we shall review some works
on unbalanced data.

**1.1 GENERAL OUTLAY OF UNBALANCED DATA**

Balanced data are those in
which every one of the subclasses of the model has the same number of
observations, that is, equal numbers of observations in all the subclasses. In
contrast, unbalanced data are those data wherein the numbers of observations in
the subclasses of the model are not all the same, that is, unequal number of
observations in the subclasses, including cases where there are no observations
in some classes. Thus unbalanced data refers not only to situations where all
subclasses have some data, namely filled subclasses, but also to cases where
some subclasses are empty, with no data in them. The estimation of variance
components from unbalanced data is more complicated than from balanced data.

In many areas of research such
as this, it is necessary to analyze the variance of data, which are classified
into two ways with unequal numbers of observations falling into each cell of
the classification. For data of this kind, special methods of analysis are
required because of the inequality of the cell numbers. This we shall attempt
to solve in this research work.

**1.2 PROBLEM INVOLVED IN RANDOM MODELS**

The
problem associated with the random effect models has been the determination of
approximate F-test in testing for the main effects say, A and B using F-ratio.
In this case there would be no obvious denominator for testing the hypothesis
Ho: σ² = 0; for a level of Factor A crossed with the level of Factor B in the
model such as X

_{ijk}= μ + α_{i}+β_{j}+ λ_{ij}+ ε_{ijk}
where,

X

_{ijk}is the k^{th}observation (for k =1,2,…,n_{ij})in the i^{th}level of Factor A and j^{th}level of Factor B; i= 1,2,…,p; j= 1,2,…,q;
µ
is the general mean;

α

_{i}is the effect due to the i^{th}level of Factor A; β_{j}is the effect due to the j^{th}level of Factor B;
λ

_{ij}is the interaction between the i^{th}level of Factor A and j^{th}level of Factor B;
ε

_{ijk}is the observation error associated with X_{ijk}.**================================================================**

**Item Type:**

**Project Material**

**| Size:**

**35 pages**

**| Chapters:**

**1-5**

**Format:**

**MS Word**

**|**

**Delivery:**

**Within 30Mins.**

**================================================================**

## No comments:

## Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.