For more Geography Project click here


Title Page
Table of Contents

1.1       Background to the Study
1.2       Statement of the Research Problem
1.3       Aim and Objectives of the Study
1.4       Hypotheses
1.5       Scope of the Study
1.6       Justification for the Study

2.2.1    Solid Waste
2.2.2    Municipal Solid Waste
2.2.3    Waste Management
2.3       Composition and Source of Waste Generation
2.4       Solid Waste Generation
2.5       Municipal Solid Waste Management In The United Kingdom
2.5.1    Overview of MSW Composition and Management in England
2.5.2    Waste Management Strategies and Policy Objectives in England
2.6       Overview of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries
2.6.1    Municipal Solid Waste Management in Sub-Saharan Africa
2.6.2    Municipal Solid Waste Management in South Africa
2.7       Solid Waste Management in Nigeria
2.7.1    Solid Waste Management in Niger State
2.8       Institutional and Policy Framework for Solid Waste Management in Nigeria
2.9       Health and Environmental Impacts of Solid Waste
2.10     Strategies for Educating and Raising Awareness on Solid Waste Management
2.11     Sustainable Solid Waste Management
2.12     Factors that Influence Waste Generation
2.13     Literature Review

3.1       Introduction
3.2       The Study Area
3.2.1    Location
3.2.2    Climate
3.2.3    Geology and Drainage
3.2.4    Soils and Vegetation
3.2.5    People and Occupation
3.3       Methodology
3.3.1    Reconnaissance Survey
3.3.2    Types of Data
3.3.3    Sources of Data
3.3.4    Sampling Size and Sampling Techniques
3.3.4    Instrument of Data Collection
3.3.5    Validity and Reliability of Instruments
3.3.6    Procedure for Data Collection
3.3.7    Method of Data Analysis

4.1       Introduction
4.2       Demographic and Socio Economic Characteristics of Respondents
4.2.1    Sex Distribution of the Respondents
4.2.2    Age Distribution of the Respondents
4.2.3    Educational Level of the Respondents
4.2.4    Occupational Distribution of the Respondents
4.2.5    Income Level of the Respondents
4.3       Types of Domestic Solid Wastes Generated in the Study Area
4.4       Domestic Solid Waste Management Strategies Employed in the Study Area
4.5       Key Players in Domestic Solid Waste Management in the Study Area
4.6       Frequency of Waste Generated and Disposed in the Study Area
4.7.      The Effective Levels of the Domestic Solid Waste Management Strategies in the Study Area
4.7.1    Respondents‟ Assessment of Burning as a Domestic Solid Waste Management Strategy
4.7.2    Respondents‟ Assessment of Burying as a Domestic Solid Waste Management Strategy
4.7.3    Respondents‟ Assessment of  Open Dumping as a Domestic Solid Waste Management Strategy
4.7.4    Respondents‟ Assessment of Niger State Environmental Protection Agency in Domestic Solid Waste Management

5.1       Introduction
5.2       Summary of Findings
5.3       Conclusion
5.4       Recommendations


Solid waste management has become the greatest problem facing many urban and semi-urban areas in Nigeria. The management of solid wastes in recent time has become a very big challenge. The problem of waste generation, handling and disposal has reached a disturbing level in Nigerian urban centers. The study analyzed domestic solid waste management strategies in Tunga, Chanchaga Local Government, Niger State, Nigeria. This was achieved through characterizing the types of domestic solid wastes generated in the study area, examining the domestic solid waste management strategies employed in the study area, identifying the key players in domestic solid waste management in the study area, examining the frequency of waste generated and waste disposed and ascertaining the effectiveness of the domestic solid waste management strategies employed in the study area. The primary data used in this study was obtained by direct field observations, questionnaire administration, oral interviews, images and photos of the study area. 327 out of 2040 households were sampled. The research questions were answered using tables of frequencies and percentages, bar and pie charts, Chi Square and Kruskal Wallis tests. The results showed that the kinds of domestic solid wastes generated in the study area were mainly organic, paper, plastic, old and rusted metals and textile wastes. The domestic solid waste management strategies in place were burning, open dumping and burying, with open dumping being the most common domestic solid waste management strategy practiced in the study area (about 72%). The key players involved in the management of solid wastes were the government and individual households. The daily generation of waste (about 74%) exceeded the daily disposal of wastes (about 49%) in the study area. 63% of the respondents reported that burning of domestic solid waste is effective, 84% reported that burying domestic solid wastes is effective while 14% reported that open dumping of domestic solid wastes is effective. The Chi Square analysis showed a significant difference between the frequency of wastes generated and waste disposed in the study area with an alpha value of 0.01, while the Kruskal Wallis H test showed no significant difference in the effectiveness of the domestic solid waste management strategies in the study area (α= 0.646). The findings of this study showed that the methods of waste management adopted in the study area do not conform to sustainable waste management practices. This implies that much attention has not been given to domestic solid waste management in the study area. The study thus recommended Public Enlightenment and Education on issues of waste management and a better public awareness strategy on the subject matter, Increase in Waste Collection Frequency and the adoption of composting as a method of waste management since majority of the domestic solid waste generated is organic in nature.



1.1              BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Waste  management  is  a  global  environmental  challenging  issue  that  is  severe

especially in developing countries where increased urbanization, poor planning and lack of adequate resources contribute to the poor state of Municipal Solid waste management (Mwanthi et al, 1997). Proper management of solid waste has been established to be critical to the health and well being of urban residents (World Bank, 2013).

According to the Federal Ministry of Environment waste is any damaged or useless material produced during or left over from human activities. The United Kingdom Environmental protection Board (1990), defines waste as any substance, a scrap material or an effluent or other unwanted surplus substance arising from the application of any process.

Rushton (2010), sees waste from a different view, according to him, one person‟s waste could be another person‟s valuable material, due to changing technologies, availability and cost of input materials, the demand and need to use recovered waste is changing; waste can therefore be defined as something that nobody wants at a particular point in time and needs to be disposed of. USEPA (2006) observed that this majority of substances are municipal solid waste which includes: paper, vegetable matter, plastic, metal textiles, rubber and glass

Aliyu (2010) classified wastes into three basic types; solid, liquid and gaseous which could be biodegradable, semi biodegradable and non-biodegradable. Based on land use and practices in the human environment, there are seven major sources of waste according to Ayo, Ibrahim and Mohammed, (2010), namely; domestic/ residential, commercial, agricultural, construction and demolition, mining, industrial and institutional wastes......

For more Geography Project click here

This is a General Thesis for both Undergraduate & Postgraduate Studies. The complete research material plus questionnaire and references can be obtained at an affordable price of N3,000 within Nigerian or its equivalent in other currencies.


Kindly pay/transfer a total sum of N3,000 into any of our Bank Accounts listed below:
·         Diamond Bank Account:
A/C Name:      Haastrup Francis
A/C No.:         0096144450

·         GTBank Account:
A/C Name:      Haastrup Francis
A/C No.:         0029938679
After payment, send your desired Project Topic, Depositor’s Name, and your Active E-Mail Address to which the material would be sent for downloading (you can request for a downloading link if you don’t have an active email address) to +2348074521866 or +2348066484965. You can as well give us a direct phone call if you wish to. Projects materials are sent in Microsoft format to your mail within 30 Minutes once payment is confirmed.

N/B:    By ordering for our material means you have read and accepted our Terms and Conditions

Terms of Use: This is an academic paper. Students should NOT copy our materials word to word, as we DO NOT encourage Plagiarism. Only use as guide in developing your original research work.

Delivery Assurance
We are trustworthy and can never SCAM you. Our success story is based on the love and fear for God plus constant referrals from our clients who have benefited from our site. We deliver project materials to your Email address within 15-30 Minutes depending on how fast your payment is acknowledged by us.

Quality Assurance
All research projects, Research Term Papers and Essays on this site are well researched, supervised and approved by lecturers who are intellectuals in their various fields of study.


Search for your topic here

To view a full list of Project Topics under your Department

Featured Post

Article: How to Write a Research Proposal

Most students and beginning researchers do not fully understand what a research proposal means, nor do they understand ...

Popular Posts