AN APPRAISAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ELIMINATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR WORLD PEACE AND SECURITY


For more Public Law Project click here



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page
Abstract
Abbreviations
Table of Treaties and Statutes
Table of Cases
Table of Contents

CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.1       Background to the Research
1.2       Statement of the Problem
1.3       Aims and Objectives of the Research
1.4       Scope of the Research
1.5       Research Methodology
1.6       Literature Review
1.7       Justification for the Research
1.8       Organization Layout

CHAPTER TWO
CLARIFICATION OF KEY TERMS, HISTORY AND EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS
2.1       Clarification of Key Terms
2.1.1 Nuclear Weapon
2.1.2 Nuclear Proliferation
2.1.3 Nuclear Non-Proliferation
2.1.4 Nuclear Disarmament
2.1.5 Nuclear Deterrence
2.1.6 Nuclear Weapon States and Non-Nuclear Weapon States
2.1.7 World Peace and Security
2.2       History of Nuclear Weapons
2.2.1 The United States of America
2.2.2 Russia (Former Soviet Union)
2.2.3 United Kingdom
2.2.4 France
2.2.5 China
2.2.6 Other Members of the Nuclear Club and the Anti-Proliferation Regime
2.2.7 The Cold War Arms Race
2.2.8 Second Nuclear Age
2.3       Effects of Nuclear Weapons
2.3.1 Effects of Nuclear Weapons Explosion
2.3.2 Effects of Nuclear Weapons Production
2.3.3    Effects of Nuclear Weapons Testing
2.3.4    Chernobyl and Fukushima
2.4 Analysis

CHAPTER THREE
AN EXAMINATION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ELIMINATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS
3.1       Overview of International Treaties on Nuclear Weapons
3.2       The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) 1968
3.2.1 Structure of the Treaty
3.2.2 Elements of Elimination in the NPT
3.2.3 State Parties’ Adherence to the Treaty
3.2.4 Challenges to the Attainment of the Objectives of the NPT
3.2.5 NPT Review Conference
3.3       The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT)
3.3.1 Obligations of State Parties
3.3.2 Measures for Attaining the Objectives of the Treaty
3.3.3 Implementation of the Treaty
3.3.4 Challenges to the Attainment of the Objectives of the CTBT
3.3.5 The CTBT and the Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty
3.4       The Nuclear Weapon Free Zone Treaties (NWFZ)
3.4.1 The African NWFZ Treaty (Treaty of Pelindaba)
3.4.2 Other NWFZ Treaties
3.4.3 Significance of NWFZ Treaties
3.4.4    Implications of NWFZ Treaties
3.4.5    Challenges of the NWFZ Treaties
3.4.6    Is a Middle-East Nuclear Weapon Free Zone Realizable?
3.5 The Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
3.6 Bilateral Treaties between Russia and the United States of America
3.7 The Advisory Opinion of the ICJ on the Legality of Nuclear Weapons
3.8 Soft Laws on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons
3.9 The Proposed Model Nuclear Weapons Convention

CHAPTER FOUR
AN EXAMINATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS ELIMINATION UNDER THE FRAMEWORK OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (IHL)
4.1       Overview of International Humanitarian Law (IHL)
4.2       Relationship between IHL and Nuclear Weapons
4.2.1 Scope of IHL on Nuclear Weapons
4.2.2 Analysis
4.3       Prohibition of the Use of Nuclear Weapons and IHL
4.4       The Arguments of the USA and the UK before the ICJ for the Validity of the Use of Nuclear Weapons
4.4.1 Arguments for the Permissibility of the Use of Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons
4.5       Permissibility of the Threat to Use Nuclear Weapons

CHAPTER FIVE
AN EXAMINATION OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE ELIMINATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS TO WORLD PEACE AND SECURITY
5.1       Introduction
5.2       Has the World Been More Peaceful Since the Emergence of Nuclear Weapons in 1945?
5.3       Does the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Increase or Decrease the Probability of Nuclear War?
5.3.1 Analysis
5.4       Challenges to World Peace and Security Posed by Nuclear Weapons
5.4.1 Nuclear Terrorism
5.4.2 Proliferation and Spread of Nuclear Weapons
5.4.3 Illicit Spread of Nuclear Materials
5.5       Implications of the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons
5.6 Are There Other Theories on Preservation of World Peace and Security?
5.6.1    The Democratic Peace Theory
5.6.2    Peace through Free Trade/Capitalism Theory
5.6.3    Peace through Law
5.6.4    Analysis

CHAPTER SIX

AN EXAMINATION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS LAW 6.1 Conceptual Analysis of the Enforcement of Nuclear Weapons Law
6.1.1 What laws are to be enforced and who enforces them?
6.2       The International Atomic Energy Agency’s Verification of Compliance with Nuclear Weapon Treaties
6.2.1 Iraq and the IAEA
6.2.2 Verification in Nuclear Weapon States
6.2.3 The IAEA’s Safeguards System: Impartial Verification Mechanism?
6.3       The United Nations Security Council: The Second Component of the Enforcement Mechanism
6.3.1 The Efficacy of the United Nations Security Council as an Enforcement Mechanism of Nuclear Weapons Law
6.4       Enforcement of Disarmament in Nuclear Weapon States
6.5       Jurisprudential and other problems with the enforcement of Nuclear weapons law
6.5.1 The Consensual character of International law: An Impediment  to Enforcement
6.5.2 The Weakness of the Components of the International Law Enforcement System
6.5.3 The States that refuse to be Party to the Nuclear Weapon Treaties
6.5.4 The Intertwining of International Law with International Politics
6.5.5 The Conflict between Disarmament and Proliferation
6.6       Profiling Potential Enforcement Facilitators

CHAPTER SEVEN
CONCLUSION
7.1       Summary
7.2       Findings
7.3       Recommendations
Bibliography




ABSTRACT

It is in the security interests of states to live in a peaceful and secure world. The pursuit of peace and security is, consequently, the desire of all states and often this finds place in their domestic policies. One of the ways in which states of the international community have sought to protect their security interests is by seeking military superiority over others and this invariably leads to conflict of interests among them. In the quest for global hegemony and military superiority, the United States of America and the Former Soviet Union in the mid-1940s developed the most destructive explosive device ever, the nuclear weapon and immediately commenced a nuclear arms race which motivated other states of the international community, United Kingdom, France and China, to produce their own nuclear weapons before 1968. In 1968, these five states sought to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons among other states of the international community and accordingly set a framework for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons with the stated intent of eventual elimination of these weapons. The most significant treaty in this framework came into effect in 1970. The Dissertation is an appraisal of the body of laws that constitute the international legal framework for the elimination of nuclear weapons and the implications of such elimination for world peace and security. The research problem that the work confronts is the failure of the international community to achieve the elimination of nuclear weapons despite the existence, since 1970, of a legal regime for that purpose. The security of the world is currently jeopardized by the proliferation of terrorist networks globally. If nuclear weapons are not completely eliminated and their means of production effectively blocked, terrorist groups could eventually gain control of them and use them to destroy the world. The primary objective of the dissertation is, accordingly, to examine the existing legal framework for the elimination of nuclear weapons with the ultimate aim of contributing solutions to nuclear weapons elimination. The research scope specifically covers the laws and policies of the nine nuclear weapon states; U.S.A, Russia, China, U.K, France, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel. The subject is, however, generally examined under the framework of international law and policy. The dissertation makes three significant findings; foremost, that the laws which constitute the international legal framework for the elimination of nuclear weapons are inadequate to achieve the goal of elimination, secondly, that a significant obstacle to the realization of the extant nuclear weapons law is the inefficiency of the enforcement mechanism of the law, thirdly, that the elimination of nuclear weapons is embroiled in power politics and therefore very difficult to achieve. Based on the findings, the dissertation recommends that a specialized agency be established under the United Nations for the sole purpose of elimination of nuclear weapons. It also recommends that international pressure should be intensified for the adoption of the proposed nuclear weapons convention as the substantive law on nuclear weapons elimination.




CHAPTER ONE

GENERAL INTRODUCTION




1.1 Background to the Research

From the dawn of time humankind has manufactured military weapons to aid them in armed conflicts with one another. The world has progressively witnessed the changing pattern of warfare, from close-range engagements with small weapons to remote exchanges with evolved weapons of mass destruction. Historians have traced the earliest weapons used in warfare to wooden clubs, sharpened sticks and stones. With the passage of time, military weapons evolved to bows and arrows, swords, catapults, ballistas, maces and lances, to guns and rockets. Advancements in technology prompted scientists to go as far as the manipulation of chemical substances and biological species to manufacture chemical and bacteriological weapons for use as weapons of mass and indiscriminate destruction. These were used in the bloodiest war ever fought in the world, World War 1.

In 1945 during the Second World War a rare and strange catastrophe shook the very roots of a great empire. The Japanese cities of Hiroshma and Nagasaki crumbled to ashes under attack from the United States of America with a new destructive weapon called the ‘atomic bomb’ and more popularly known as the ‘nuclear bom` b.’ The U.S.A had then only recently manufactured the atomic bomb and had become the first state of the international community to produce the specie of weaponry that would influence and dictate the interactions between states to the present time.

Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction, which if used, will cause unfathomable destructive effects on human beings and the natural environment. Analysts have projected the effects of a major nuclear exchange to result in the death of millions of civilians within a very short period of time......


For more Public Law Project click here


____________________________________________________________________________
This is a Ph.D Thesis and the complete research material plus questionnaire and references can be obtained at an affordable price of N4,000 within Nigerian or its equivalent in other currencies.


INSTRUCTION ON HOW TO GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL

Kindly pay/transfer a total sum of N4,000 into any of our Bank Accounts listed below:
·         Diamond Bank Account:
A/C Name:      Haastrup Francis
A/C No.:         0096144450

·         GTBank Account:
A/C Name:      Haastrup Francis
A/C No.:         0029938679

After payment, send your desired Project Topic, Depositor’s Name, and your Active E-Mail Address to which the material would be sent for downloading (you can request for a downloading link if you don’t have an active email address) to +2348074521866 or +2348066484965. You can as well give us a direct phone call if you wish to. Projects materials are sent in Microsoft format to your mail within 30 Minutes once payment is confirmed.

--------------------------------------------------------
N/B:    By ordering for our material means you have read and accepted our Terms and Conditions


Terms of Use: This is an academic paper. Students should NOT copy our materials word to word, as we DO NOT encourage Plagiarism. Only use as guide in developing your original research work.

Delivery Assurance
We are trustworthy and can never SCAM you. Our success story is based on the love and fear for God plus constant referrals from our clients who have benefited from our site. We deliver project materials to your Email address within 15-30 Minutes depending on how fast your payment is acknowledged by us.

Quality Assurance
All research projects, Research Term Papers and Essays on this site are well researched, supervised and approved by lecturers who are intellectuals in their various fields of study.